By
now you’ve probably heard about the mini-backlash that’s ensued over Apple’s botched Maps
implementation on iOS 6 after it decided to ditch Google Maps
earlier this year. But anyone paying attention to the Apple-Google rivalry shouldn’t be surprised that
Apple would flop in its first attempt at creating a maps application that’s
traditionally been Google’s bread and butter. After all, Apple and Google have
two entirely different business models and strategies, and the two companies
find themselves competing despite, not because of, those models.
Let’s
start with Apple’s strategy because it’s relatively straightforward. Apple
basically wants consumers to fall in love with every aspect of Apple hardware
and software, and it wants people to make Apple computers,
smartphones, tablets and music players central to their everyday lives. In case
you haven’t noticed, the company is extremely good at this, as its hardware is
consistently lighter, thinner and more attractive than its rivals and its
operating systems are amazingly smooth and pain-free, especially when compared
with Windows-based devices.
Google
is a different animal entirely. Its goal is not to peddle hardware or to even
software per se, but to instead focus relentlessly on improving the Internet,
both from a performance and an access perspective. Google’s revenue model is
simple: The more
clicks its sites and its partner sites get, the more money it makes
from advertisements. And the best way to ensure that its sites keep getting
clicks is to make sure more people have access to high-speed Internet service
that delivers content quickly and efficiently.
This
is why Google pushed out Android as an open-source operating system: It wanted
to expand access to the mobile web so consumers have more opportunities to
click on Google sites, and the millions of sites that run Google’s ads, even
when they weren’t sitting at their desktops. Similarly, Google decided to build
out Google Fiber as a way to spur incumbent ISPs to build out faster networks
that would result in more use of Google products. And yes, it’s the same story
with Chrome: Google figured out that more people would use its sites if they
had access to a high-performance Web browser.
No comments:
Post a Comment